Solutions · INEX365

Every weighing leaves a trail of evidence.

INEX365 is an AI-powered weighbridge management solution. Every vehicle in and out is recorded with weight, images and time; AI reviews every weighing ticket to detect and flag anomalies, then syncs to InexHub so businesses and banks can follow the flow of goods together.

Book a Pilot deployment →

Electronic weighing ticket

#PC-0482

Plate (auto-recognised)76D-006.02

Weighing 1 · 238,420 · 14,150 kg

Net weight24,270 kg

InexHub syncRECORDED

Illustrative interface

The problem

If you cannot monitor the weighbridge, you cannot monitor the collateral

For bulk goods such as timber, agricultural produce and minerals, weight through the weighbridge is the main way to know whether stock rises or falls each day. But weighbridges are often remote, run by on-site staff, and many weighing programs let tickets be edited or deleted without a trace.

FOR BUSINESS OWNERS

Losses happen where they are hardest to see

Managing several factories remotely, seeing only summary figures at the end of the day.
Losses through tare weights, re-weighing and deleted tickets hide among thousands of tickets and are hard to spot by eye.
When something looks wrong, there is no clear evidence to act on staff or delivery partners.

FOR BANKS

Collateral value depends on data that cannot be verified

Goods passing over the weighbridge determine collateral value, yet the bank has no access to the source data.
Banks receive only self-prepared reports from the business, often days late.
No way to tell whether a discrepancy comes from equipment faults, process errors or intent.

Common discrepancies at weighbridges

01

Figures edited after weighing

Weight, goods type, customer or plate number changed after the ticket was completed.

02

Tickets deleted, numbers reissued

A ticket is deleted and its number reused for another trip, so the original shipment disappears from the records.

03

Pending tickets overwritten, re-weighing

The first weighing of a shipment is replaced with another weighing, and the actual weight is no longer on the ticket.

04

Abnormal tare weights

Tare weighed with goods, water or people still in the truck, or with the truck not fully on the scale.

05

Ticket differs from the display

The figure locked on the ticket does not match the scale display at the same moment.

06

Missing or blurry photos

No photo, a blurry photo or no visible plate, so nothing can be checked in a dispute.

Solutions · INEX365

AI-powered weighbridge management: review and flag every anomaly

INEX365 does more than record weighing tickets. It keeps a trail of every change, stores photo evidence for every weighing, and uses AI to review all tickets to find anomalies, analyse their causes and recommend actions.

01

An audit trail that cannot be erased

Every create, edit, delete and re-weigh is written to the audit trail. Deleted tickets keep their history and camera photos.

02

AI image cross-checks

AI reads the figure in the photo of the scale display and compares it with the figure locked on the ticket, and checks plate and truck-bed photos on entry and exit.

03

Compared with each truck's history

Each truck's tare is compared with that truck's full weighing history. Time between weighings and the number of ticket prints are tracked too.

04

Severity & root-cause classification

Each ticket is graded by severity and cause group: Software & equipment, Operating process, or Suspected intent, with a specific recommended action.

Sample weighing ticket review report

Excerpt from a real INEX365 review at a business with 3 factories and 4 weighbridges. Business, factory, plate and ticket numbers have been anonymised.

INEX365 · WEIGHING TICKET REVIEW REPORT

Review period: 2 months · 3 factories · 4 weighbridges · Vietnam time

2.754

weighing tickets reviewed

1.332

scale display photos read by AI

382

tickets with discrepancies – need checking

12

tickets suspected of deliberate edits

RATING BY FACTORY

Factory A

890 tickets

■ 5■ 65■ 368■ 452

Factory B

758 tickets

■ 6■ 98■ 237■ 417

Factory C

1,106 tickets

■ 1■ 219■ 239■ 647

■ Suspected deliberate edit■ Discrepancy – check■ Minor warning■ Matched

WHAT AI CHECKS ON EVERY TICKET

Edit, delete and re-weigh history

Ticket figure vs scale display

Tare vs the truck's history

Plate photos on entry / exit

Time between the two weighings

Pending tickets, number of prints

3 cause groups: Software & equipment · Operating process · Suspected intent

KEY FINDINGS & AI ROOT-CAUSE ANALYSIS

Suspected deliberate editFACTORY B · 5 TICKETS

Tickets deleted and numbers reissued

5 completed tickets were deleted on the same day and their numbers reused for other trips. About 59 tonnes of goods no longer appear in the weighing records.

✦ AI ROOT-CAUSE ANALYSIS

The change history shows the tickets were deleted after completion. Camera photos of the deleted trips are still stored, confirming the shipments were real.

Cause group: Suspected intent

Recommendation: Lock the right to delete completed tickets; cross-check warehouse receipts and payment documents for the deleted trips.

Suspected deliberate editFACTORY C · 1 TICKET

Re-weighed and overwritten after the truck was empty

The first weighing of a timber truck (29,600 kg) was replaced with 10,530 kg. The ticket shows only 190 kg of goods; about 19 tonnes are missing from the records.

✦ AI ROOT-CAUSE ANALYSIS

Comparing camera photos from both moments: the original weighing shows a truck full of timber, the replacement weighing shows an empty truck bed.

Cause group: Suspected intent

Recommendation: Block re-weighing after unloading; every re-weigh must be approved with a stated reason.

Suspected deliberate editFACTORY A · 5 TICKETS

Pending tickets overwritten

Tickets waiting for the second weighing were overwritten by another weighing, changing the first weight by 1 tonne or more. The first shipment no longer has its own ticket.

✦ AI ROOT-CAUSE ANALYSIS

Comparing photos of each weighing: one ticket's re-weigh photo shows an empty scale with no truck.

Cause group: Suspected intent / Operating process

Recommendation: Do not allow weighing over a pending ticket; pending tickets past their time limit trigger an automatic alert.

Discrepancy – checkFACTORY B · SCALE 2

Ticket differs from the display by +250 kg

The scale display read 68,760 kg, but the ticket locked 69,010 kg. This is an inbound ticket, so the goods may be recorded above their actual weight.

✦ AI ROOT-CAUSE ANALYSIS

AI read the figure in the display photo at the moment the ticket was locked. The photo shows the truck fully on the scale and stationary, so the difference is not caused by movement.

Cause group: Needs verification (equipment or intent)

Recommendation: Review the video at the time of weighing; long term, read figures directly from the scale indicator and alert on differences above 20 kg.

WarningFACTORY A · 3 TICKETS

Abnormally high tare of 1.0–1.2 tonnes

Tare weight above that truck's standard tare in its own history, so inbound goods are recorded below their actual weight.

✦ AI ROOT-CAUSE ANALYSIS

Photos of the truck bed at tare weighing show wood chips, bark, rainwater, a water drum and people standing on the truck.

Cause group: Operating process

Recommendation: Empty the bed and have people step off before tare weighing; alert automatically when tare deviates more than 8% from the standard.

VerifiedFACTORY A · 3 TICKETS

Abnormally low tare: verified as a different vehicle

Three tickets for an unregistered farm truck showed a tare far below its history and were first flagged as discrepancies.

✦ AI ROOT-CAUSE ANALYSIS

After checking with the business: it was a different, lighter farm truck sharing the same name. The weights were correct and the warning was downgraded.

Cause group: Operating process

Recommendation: Assign a unique code to each unregistered vehicle and record a standard tare per code.

Plate photo check: 81% of photos show a plate; AI found exit photos blurrier than entry photos and crops too tight on many tickets → recommend widening the crop by 15–20% and asking repeat vehicles to clean their plates.

Illustrative report, excerpted from real anonymised data. Findings rated “Suspected deliberate edit” are alerts for the business to verify with video and documents before drawing conclusions.

The whole weighing process, automated

Truck arrives

The camera identifies the vehicle and opens a weighing session.

First weighing

Weight recorded with a photo taken at that exact moment.

Loading / unloading

The weighing is linked to the lot and its location in the warehouse.

Second weighing

Net weight calculated, photos from both weighings compared.

Sync

The ticket locks its data and is sent to InexHub.

AI review

Detects anomalies, analyses causes and sends alerts.

Weighbridge monitoring: direct, secure and transparent collateral monitoring

Electronic weighing ticket

Takes readings directly from the scale indicator, limiting manual entry.

AI camera evidence

Captures and stores photos of the vehicle and load at every weighing.

A trail for every adjustment

Every edit needs a reason and a named user, and is logged.

Inbound and outbound reports

Summaries by day, customer, goods type and vehicle.

Multi-site management

Central monitoring of weighbridges at different locations.

Scale display cross-check

AI reads the figure in the display photo and compares it with the figure on the ticket.

AI review & alerts

Severity, cause group and recommended action for every ticket.

InexHub integration

Goods passing the weighbridge update the collateral status.

Suited to Bulk goods warehouses Agricultural and forestry processing Building materials, minerals Ports, storage yards Businesses with many weighbridges

Digitise your weighbridge

Start a Pilot on one weighbridge and evaluate with real data.

Book a Pilot deployment →